In Los Angeles, the legal landscape for gig economy workers—particularly drivers for Uber and Lyft—remains complex and contentious. Despite significant legal battles and legislative efforts, the classification of these drivers as independent contractors continues to be a focal point of debate.
Proposition 22
In 2020, California voters passed Proposition 22, a ballot initiative backed by Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies, which classified their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This measure exempted these companies from providing employee benefits such as minimum wage, overtime, and unemployment insurance. Instead, it offered drivers certain benefits, including a wage floor, health insurance stipends, and reimbursement for vehicle expenses
In 2024, the California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 22, affirming the classification of Uber and Lyft drivers as independent contractors. This decision was seen as a significant victory for gig economy companies, allowing them to maintain their business models without the financial obligations associated with employee status .
Wage Theft Allegations and State Enforcement Actions
Despite the legal victories for Uber and Lyft, drivers have continued to allege wage theft and misclassification. In response, the California Labor Commissioner filed lawsuits against both companies, accusing them of willfully misclassifying drivers as independent contractors and thereby depriving them of basic labor protections . These lawsuits seek to recover unpaid wages and other compensation that drivers are entitled to under California labor law.
Additionally, in March 2025, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with city attorneys from Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego, initiated negotiations with Uber and Lyft to settle wage theft claims affecting approximately 250,000 drivers. The drivers contend that they were misclassified before the passage of Prop 22, leading to significant financial losses from unpaid wages and expenses .
Broader Implications and Future Outlook
The ongoing legal issues surrounding Uber, Lyft, and independent contractors in Los Angeles highlight the broader national debate over the classification of gig economy workers.
While gig economy companies argue that independent contractor status provides flexibility for workers, labor advocates contend that it leads to exploitation and denies workers essential benefits and protections.
As legal challenges and negotiations continue, the future of gig economy labor laws in California remains uncertain. The outcomes of these cases could have significant implications not only for Uber and Lyft drivers but also for gig economy workers nationwide.
Get a free consultation. Liat Cohen, Esq. at 818-579-9996.